7.1 Hand scoring and general instructions.2.2 Instrument rubric table: Reliability.2.1 Steps for evaluating reliability and validity.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved). The BFI-2 therefore offers valuable new opportunities for research examining the structure, assessment, development, and life outcomes of personality traits. Specifically, the BFI-2 introduces a robust hierarchical structure, controls for individual differences in acquiescent responding, and provides greater bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power than the original BFI, while still retaining the original measure's conceptual focus, brevity, and ease of understanding. The results of these studies indicate that the BFI-2 is a reliable and valid personality measure, and an important advance over the original BFI. Study 3 used data from 2 validation samples to evaluate the BFI-2's measurement properties and substantive relations with self-reported and peer-reported criteria. Study 2 used conceptual and empirical criteria to construct the BFI-2 domain and facet scales from the preliminary item pool. Study 1 specified a hierarchical model of personality structure with 15 facet traits nested within the Big Five domains, and developed a preliminary item pool to measure this structure. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-17156-001.) Three studies were conducted to develop and validate the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2), a major revision of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Available from All versions of this article have been corrected. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Association for Research in Personality, St. Conceptualization, development, and initial validation of the Big Five Inventory-2. The complete citation in the References list should appear as follows: Soto, C. John, 2015, Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Association for Research in Personality. The attribution to the BFI-2 items that appears in the Table 6 note should read as follows: BFI-2 items adapted from "Conceptualization, Development, and Initial Validation of the Big Five Inventory-2," by C. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. The complete citation should read as follows: McCrae, R. In the article, all citations to McCrae and Costa (2008), except for the instance in which it appears in the first paragraph of the introduction, should instead appear as McCrae and Costa (2010). John ( Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Apr 7, 2016, np). Reports an error in "The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power" by Christopher J.
0 kommentar(er)
